<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Journal &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchenginejournal.org/tag/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchenginejournal.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:48:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Page Quality Factors for Link Building</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/page-quality-factors-for-link-building.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/page-quality-factors-for-link-building.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ranking Facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Page Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web surfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo and MSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know that Google uses back links to size up your website and determine its ranking. You also know that it wants to see quality back links, and if you want to rank high on the search engine results pages, you need to get quality links that are relevant to your keywords. But what is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that Google uses back links to size up your website and determine its ranking. You also know that it wants to see quality back links, and if you want to rank high on the search engine results pages, you need to get quality links that are relevant to your keywords. But what is a quality link? If you&#8217;re not sure how to decide whether you should try to get a back link from a particular page or web site, this article may help guide your decision.</p>
<p>Link building is the most important part of search engine optimization activity targeting the Google search engine. As an overview, this search engine relies on links to determine the reputation of the page. This is analogous to citations in the world of scientific or academic papers. A single quality and relevant link from a trusted and authoritative source is equivalent to thousands of low-quality and irrelevant links.</p>
<p>It is common sense that links from these types of sources are desirable because they are powerful. Sources of such links speak with authority and are popular and expert in their own fields. Therefore if you get references from these types of documents, there is something in your work that catches their attention, and in the long run, you may become trusted and authoritative also.<span id="more-823"></span></p>
<p>For example, in the scientific or academic environment, scientists and scholars often cite each other in research papers, to give reference or acknowledge a certain source. Of course, the more trusted and authoritative the source, the higher the number of citations it receives from other published scientific or academic works.</p>
<p>One example of this is Albert Einstein&#8217;s paper on the Theory of Relativity, where Einstein cited Isaac Newton&#8217;s Universal Laws of Gravitation. The same concept works when applied to the online world. Quality documents are referenced by other quality and relevant documents.</p>
<p>Larry Page and Sergey Brin, researchers from Stanford University, translated this very simple analogy of finding quality documents in the academic world into an application in the online world, resulting in the birth of Google and its algorithm: Page rank. Google then leads the multi-billion dollar search industry that still remains strong even today (2009).</p>
<p>This article aims to educate the search engine optimization community as to what particular qualities or factors the search engines used to rate the quality of the linking page in assessing back links.</p>
<p>Page Quality Factors for Link Building &#8211; Relevance of the page:</p>
<p>Do not get me wrong, but if you like to get quality links, you must get them from a related web page. Why? Google (and other search engines such as Yahoo and MSN) aims at giving its users a satisfying search experience on the web, and as we all know, the web is powered by hyperlinks.</p>
<p>If certain documents on a certain topic are linking out to irrelevant documents, this can result in a poor user experience. This is because the flow of thoughts and knowledge is being cut off. Sometimes a visitor will need to look at several web pages to be convinced and feel confident of the knowledge acquired from them. Below is a simple diagram of a web surfer&#8217;s learning process for a certain topic in which he or she is interested:</p>
<p>It starts when a web surfer likes to find information about Topic &#8220;X.&#8221; If the user does not have any bookmarked pages to look for that information, he/she will use the Google search engines to look for the relevant topic.</p>
<p>When search engines give the most relevant search results, the web surfer will click on that link from the search results page and then start reading. Now if the web surfer finds that information to be insufficient, he or she will look for relevant information by clicking on the most relevant link that matches his or her query.</p>
<p>What is the lesson? If Google does not evaluate links in terms of relevance, it will tend to return pages that are neither referenced from related sources nor linking out to related websites. This will not return the most relevant pages, which will affect the user&#8217;s experience.</p>
<p>The relevance of the page is therefore the most important inbound linking factor. It directly relates to the user&#8217;s satisfaction level. The user does not have any SEO knowledge to assess whether the page is an authority, but he does read the content and decide if it answers the query.</p>
<p>It makes sense that the relevance of the page will surely get a high rating in Google&#8217;s algorithm. Again, beware of paid posts and paid links, as you can easily get links from relevant pages by means of sponsorship. Organic links from related pages get referenced naturally. This means that the link itself is part of the web page&#8217;s content. Without it, the document cannot stand by itself.</p>
<p>This is an easy distinction between paid and organic links. It is possible to comprehend and read the page&#8217;s content without the paid or advertisement links. But it is impossible to thoroughly understand the page&#8217;s content without the organic links supporting it.</p>
<p>Page Quality Factors for Link Building &#8211; Number of links on the page:</p>
<p>Of course, if a certain relevant page links out to a single page (no other external links to other domains can be found on the page), then that target page must be of absolute importance. If a certain document links out to several web pages, then the location of the links on the linking page itself determines the importance and value of that link. If the link appears on a prominent part of the web page, it&#8217;s more important than one that appears in the footer section. If a link appears in the page&#8217;s content itself, it is more valuable than one that appears in the sidebar or navigation.</p>
<p>A spammy link page, like that of a link farm or low quality directory, consists of hundreds or thousands of links on the page. This is because this type of page exists not to satisfy users, but just for search engine purposes. As a result, this type of link is awarded zero value by Google search engines. If you get links from these types of sources, they are useless and a waste of time.</p>
<p>If you completely understand the mathematics behind Page Rank, you will be amazed; if a certain page has fewer external links, then the link density is very high, and this means it carries more Page Rank weight.</p>
<p>Google Page Rank, as the patent suggests, is a measure of the importance of the page. It is used to assess the quality of a linking page, when combined with content relevance factors as discussed above.</p>
<p>For example if we were to design a link algorithm to evaluate page relevance and importance, then it might be:</p>
<p>Rating of Page Rank (importance): 1 to 10 (where 1 is least importance and 10 to absolute importance)</p>
<p>Rating of Page Relevance (content): 1 to 10 (where 1 is least relevance and 10 is a perfect match for the query)</p>
<p>Then the relevance rating based on these two factors might be:</p>
<p>Relevance rating = Page Rank x Page Relevance</p>
<p>As we expect, quality related documents are rated by both page importance and relevance. It is a clear objective for search engines to return a page that is both important and relevant.</p>
<p>Page Quality Factors for Link Building &#8211; Trust and authority of the domain:</p>
<p>As we have previously discussed, links from trusted and authoritative websites will get a higher value in search engines algorithm. But why?</p>
<p>Search engines believe that experience is the best teacher, so if a certain website has been in existence for a long time (old domain), the knowledge and expertise it displays in that specific topic is very solid and profound when compared to young domains. But an old domain alone does not equal a site with trust and authority. The domain should also be highly referenced by other sources. To measure this quantitatively is to directly see the Page Rank of the home page.</p>
<p>Page Rank is also the measure of the incoming links to the page. The higher the number of links, the higher the Page Rank will be. Or if a certain domain is being referenced by high Page Rank domains, it will also get a higher Page Rank through its very nature (a link from an important page will make your page important also).</p>
<p>Other factors associated with trusted and authoritative websites, aside from domain Page Rank and age of domain, include the size of the domain. Frequently updating a certain domain will make the website grow bigger with each update, so after years of existence the website will become very big and will be able to provide lots of useful information.</p>
<p>Summary of the overall desirable factors in a link:</p>
<p>To sum up, below are the most important factors for which major search engines (Google in particular) will give a higher rating pertaining to the quality of the link:</p>
<p>1. Relevance of the page &#8211; Links from a relevant page help both search engines and users find the information they need.</p>
<p>2. Number of links in the page &#8211; A lower number of links ensures that the link itself is more important and become an indispensable part of the content.</p>
<p>3. Trust and authority of the domain &#8211; Links from expert sites mean that your website is deemed important and contains highly valued content. A vote from important sites will also make your site important and be valued by search engines.</p>
<p>Mathematically it can be:</p>
<p>Inbound link rating = (Relevance of the page x Trust/Authority factor of the domain)/ (Number of links on the page)</p>
<p>If you are doing link building, go for these types of links. It is not as easy as it sound, because you must pass their content quality standards. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/page-quality-factors-for-link-building.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing Of Internet</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/marketing-of-internet.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/marketing-of-internet.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Marketing is a discipline that uses SEO and open other marketing tools to gain the attention of potential customers and search engines. These tools work to drive motivated customers to your site, and thus allow you to compete more effectively and increase sales.
Pay Per Click (PPC) :
With Pay Per Click (PPC) advertising, a bet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Marketing is a discipline that uses SEO and open other marketing tools to gain the attention of potential customers and search engines. These tools work to drive motivated customers to your site, and thus allow you to compete more effectively and increase sales.<br />
Pay Per Click (PPC) :<br />
With Pay Per Click (PPC) advertising, a bet on the keywords you think potential customers will join the search engine to look for your products or services. For example, if you sell telecommunications services, you can auction for keywords such as &#8220;VoIP, phone systems or Internet service provider.&#8221; You choose these keywords in the hope that a user enters these keywords in the search bar, see their ad, click and buy. These ads are called sponsored links or sponsored ads, and usually appear to the natural results in a search page. Pay your ad only when the user clicks on it. Google AdWords and Yahoo! Search Marketing (formerly Overture) are currently the largest PPC providers. Our job is to help you choose PPC keywords to match your business initiative, develop and place ads profitable.</p>
<p>Interactive advertising using interactive media such as banner ads and Flash to get an active response from visitors. Promote their products and services and inform customers. If they are well designed, interactive advertising allows you to engage customers in a direct and personal, and this creates a communication other than that may affect purchasing decisions. RTN Europe produce presentations, mini websites and online advertising campaigns to help you compete.<br />
E-mail marketing:</p>
<p>E-mail marketing, including email newsletters and online, is a form of relationship marketing based on obtaining the authorization of the client. Once people agree to receive periodic announcements about your products and services have the opportunity to turn your potential customers to existing customers, retain customers and create value for your business. We help you build cost-effective campaigns that reach e-mail directly to potential customers, strengthening your brand and establish lasting relationships with existing customers.<br />
Marketing &#8220;White Paper&#8221; :</p>
<p>The White Paper is designed to promote your business solutions with reference to specific topics. They also help to position your company as a leader in a given sector. The White Paper can be very effective in generating clues, which are normally distributed after having obtained the customer&#8217;s contact information. Our development team can write and research content and content of this document for you. Our teams of marketing and development partners to generate and collect clues.<br />
Blog Marketing :<br />
From the viewpoint of corporate marketing, blogs offer many advantages. First, they provide an easy way to introduce new content to your site on an ongoing basis. The presence of newly added content attracts more attention from search engines, therefore it is likely that your site has a higher ranking with a blog than without it. Our services can help you develop a blogging strategy, integrating a blog into your website or ghostwrite &#8220;your content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/marketing-of-internet.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search engine optimization (SEO)</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/search-engine-optimization-seo.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/search-engine-optimization-seo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google to crawl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Webmaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO is an acronym in English of &#8220;SEO&#8221; (Search Engine Optimization) or &#8220;search engine optimizers&#8221; (Search Engine Optimizer). Hiring an SEO is a very important decision that can improve your site and save you time, but you risk damaging its reputation and performance. Be sure to check both the potential benefits and harm that a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-758" title="seo-blocks" src="http://searchenginejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/seo-blocks-300x231.gif" alt="seo-blocks" width="266" height="205" />SEO is an acronym in English of &#8220;SEO&#8221; (Search Engine Optimization) or &#8220;search engine optimizers&#8221; (Search Engine Optimizer). Hiring an SEO is a very important decision that can improve your site and save you time, but you risk damaging its reputation and performance. Be sure to check both the potential benefits and harm that a solvent can cause little SEO on your site. Many SEOs and other agencies and consultants provide useful services for website owners<span id="more-754"></span>, including:<br />
review the content and site structure,<br />
technical assistance in the development of websites, eg accommodation, redirects, error pages, use of JavaScript, and so on.,<br />
content development,<br />
Management online business development campaigns,<br />
research on keywords and<br />
SEO training,<br />
experience in specific sectors and geographic regions.</p>
<p>Remember that the search results page often includes organic search results and often paid advertising (as indicated by the heading &#8220;Sponsored Links&#8221;). Advertise on Google does not influence the position in which your site appears in search results. Google never accepts money to include or rank sites in our search results appear in organic search results is free. There are free resources such as Google Webmaster Tools, the Webmaster Central blog and the official discussion forum that can provide a wealth of information about optimizing your website for organic search. You can find many of these free resources and information on paid search, the Google Webmaster Central.</p>
<p>Before you start looking for an SEO, it is important to make as a consumer and get familiar with the operation of search engines. To begin:<br />
Google Webmaster Guidelines<br />
Google 101: systems that use Google to crawl, index and display Web content.</p>
<p>If you are considering hiring an SEO, the sooner you do, the better. A good time to hire is when these services will change the design of your site or when you publish a new site. This will ensure that the site has been designed to meet the requirements of search engine. However, a good SEO can also help improve an existing site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/search-engine-optimization-seo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indexing – the Basics</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/indexing-%e2%80%93-the-basics.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/indexing-%e2%80%93-the-basics.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTML and Page Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know how doubtful and unpredictable the majority of optimization methods are. You find and learn something, you make sites and they seem to be positioned on top pages, but everything ruins all of a sudden, Google adds new filters, new page appraisal methods and you can just take a deep breath.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know how doubtful and unpredictable the majority of optimization methods are. You find and learn something, you make sites and they seem to be positioned on top pages, but everything ruins all of a sudden, Google adds new filters, new page appraisal methods and you can just take a deep breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/indexing-%e2%80%93-the-basics.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putting your sites’ URLs in order with redirects.</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/putting-your-sites%e2%80%99-urls-in-order-with-redirects.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/putting-your-sites%e2%80%99-urls-in-order-with-redirects.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTML and Page Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmasters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many webmasters are getting in trouble with web hosts that suppose two different pages creation for http://searchenginejournal.org/ and yoursite.com. Of course you can create a copy of index page and put it in both folders, but such an action can force Google to filter you for duplicate content.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many webmasters are getting in trouble with web hosts that suppose two different pages creation for http://searchenginejournal.org/ and yoursite.com. Of course you can create a copy of index page and put it in both folders, but such an action can force Google to filter you for duplicate content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/putting-your-sites%e2%80%99-urls-in-order-with-redirects.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Link Popularity, Relevancy and Link Text</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/link-popularity-relevancy-and-link-text.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/link-popularity-relevancy-and-link-text.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gourmet food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to discuss relationship of Link Popularity, relevancy and text links. As you surely know, link popularity is counted exactly by number of links pointing certain page, but these are just basics. Method of building certain value of Link Popularity that I have already described was working on Google few years ago, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to discuss relationship of Link Popularity, relevancy and text links. As you surely know, link popularity is counted exactly by number of links pointing certain page, but these are just basics. <span id="more-161"></span>Method of building certain value of Link Popularity that I have already described was working on Google few years ago, but it had changed and that is the point of interest &#8211; what changes occur and how can we improve our link popularity strategies?</p>
<p>Certainly, when relevancy became one of the most important criteria of appreciation of each page, it has also affected Link Popularity calculation. Due to my little investigation, a page that has ten inbound links with same keyword in link text will have better link popularity than a page that has the same ten inbound links, but with different keywords inside this link.</p>
<p>However, there is some limit of quantity of same inbound links, and you risk to get your site filtered or banned for spamming if you cross this limit. I tried to guess what can I do in this situation and the only thought I had is to put synonims and associated words after each thenth ibound link to my sites. For instance if I’d had a site about gourmet food, I’d put 10 links with “gourmet”, ten links with “delicious” and ten links with “tasty” keywords. This will dilute keyword density, but prevent my site from loosing link popularity, because Google knows that<br />
these keywords are synonyms.</p>
<p>The other way I think about is that Google considers two phrases to be same when they are identical by symbols. If you add some extra words like adding “gourmet food” to “gourmet” &#8211; you will lose relevancy of your general keyword “gourmet”, but popularity is lost because of dilusion by something meanful and I thought what will happen if I add something senseless to my keyword? For instance if I add “+” to “gourmet”, then “gourmet +” will be different to “gourmet”, but at the same time it won’t gain any additional meaning. I consider the same tactic, when choosing domain names. Google likes, when domain is corresponding site title and most frequent keywords on site, but the majority of good domains are already taken. At the same time if you buy a domain that contains extra words, it is loosing relevancy. That is why I oftenly buy domains like “gourmet1″ or “gourmet-1″ that are containing my general keyword and a meaningless symbol that won’t affect relevancy and popularity.</p>
<p>These are techniques I use, but I’m sure you have much interesting to tell too. Waiting for your opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/link-popularity-relevancy-and-link-text.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yesterday Yahoo! Launched New Search Index</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/yesterday-yahoo-launched-new-search-index.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/yesterday-yahoo-launched-new-search-index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Yahoo and MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Search Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo! Seems to have started working seriously on their search. Many updates, new features, plans. This time, Tim Mayer has announced search index updates. Personally, I hope that Yahoo! will finally make competition to Google, cause being “the one and only” Google makes a lot of difficulties for webmasters.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo! Seems to have started working seriously on their search. Many updates, new features, plans. This time, Tim Mayer has announced search index updates. Personally, I hope that Yahoo! will finally make competition to Google, cause being “the one and only” Google makes a lot of difficulties for webmasters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/yesterday-yahoo-launched-new-search-index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! wins Google at Indexing Blogs</title>
		<link>http://searchenginejournal.org/yahoo-wins-google-at-indexing-blogs.html</link>
		<comments>http://searchenginejournal.org/yahoo-wins-google-at-indexing-blogs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Yahoo and MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginejournal.org/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Yahoo! search engine updates are very significant for this search engine. SEO research confirms that Yahoo! is now better at indexing blogs than Google and Technorati. While Google is perfectly indexing only large, hourly updated blogs, Yahoo! gives way to all of them, even the smallest ones. Personal blogs updated daily or even weekly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Yahoo! search engine updates are very significant for this search engine. SEO research confirms that Yahoo! is now better at indexing blogs than Google and Technorati. While Google is perfectly indexing <span id="more-116"></span>only large, hourly updated blogs, Yahoo! gives way to all of them, even the smallest ones. Personal blogs updated daily or even weekly find their place in Yahoo! index.<br />
We think that such situation on search engines field is a result of that Google has probably slowed their research in search engine field. According to their news for the last six months or even more, their attention is mostly busy with fighting indecent webmasters, launching Gmail and so on. At the same time Yahoo! has been working on search improvement – an you can already hear about results – this post is a good example. It seemed hardly to believe that somebody can be better than Google at anything.</p>
<p>Yahoo! SERPs analysis says that if Yahoo! had equal traffic to Google, average blog would receive much more traffic from Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchenginejournal.org/yahoo-wins-google-at-indexing-blogs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
